Field Notes Inside an Integrated Communications Agency

Our project timelines run the gambit. I haven't been able to nail down what is better, so fast you can't keep track or so slow that you can't remember when the project actually started. They both have pros and cons and in the end it is hard to tell what is just right.

Recently a few projects have come in that moved so fast we couldn't apply our standard process (whole other post) and although it's not ideal there are some positives. You move so fast that no one has time to over think and overspend, but it does leave room for late nights and missing things. Missing things doesn't mean they get swept under the rug, it means really late nights with multiple people working on a project...and a then a blown budget. But they aren't all bad, if you get a good scope document and everyone involved from the get go, it can run really smoothly. Enough budget and resources can make anything run smooth, even if the schedule is start to finish 2 weeks.

On the other side of the spectrum I have had a few that run slower than molasses in January. They seem like a dream, and that's exactly what they are. Things move so slow in snippets of time it is hard to remember what happened from week to week. The possibility of knowledge transfer becoming fuzzy is high and team turnover can happen. The group that kicked the project off might not have the bandwidth in 4 months time when things come around to them and in some cases might not be around anymore. However, if you have your original team and manage not to procrastinate you can execute some well strategized thoughts without

Timelines are like organic chemistry and each property, structure and reaction changes the compound. I don't know what the perfect timeline is. But if I had to guess it is anywhere from 1 week to 1 year.

Remember Katrina? Remember Michael Chertoff? Remember Michael Brown? Of course you do. I remember a colossal failure of communications and flow control. And I remember hundreds of thousands of people displaced - millions more directly or indirectly affected by the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history. I cannot unequivocally condone or condemn the actions of any party involved, because I was not there. I can only report on what I saw and heard from my trusty media outlets, and, perhaps more credibly, from the handful of relocated friends I have since and often spoken with about the subject. But it's got me remembering something one wise man or another once told me: perception, my friends, is everything.

In the wake of Katrina, the U.S. government found itself with a PR belly ache of monumental proportions. Scapegoats were scrounged, press conferences called. Blame was at once gallantly accepted and deftly shifted. Contrite, demonstrative hierarchal shake-ups were laid at the feet of The People, in an unprecedented effort to save face. Did it work? Weeell... I don't think anyone has forgotten the dropped balls of August 2005, and poll numbers don't seem to show any trends of resounding confidence among Americans in their governmental agencies. But crisis management teams within these various agencies are now battle-tested, that's for sure.

If you Google the phrase "crisis management", you will find yourself confronted with a veritable who's-who of the fallen celebrities of our time. Michael Jackson, Lindsey, Britney, Michael Vick - politicians and dignitaries of all persuasion - all followed the same basic rules of engagement in attempting to restore their good name:

1) Immediately assess the situation, and clearly identify the depth and extent of your involvement.

2) State your position clearly and confidently to the press.

3) STOP talking about it, and quietly and contritely go about your business and wait for things to cool off.

4) Get to work rebuilding your image.

Now, I'm no public relations expert - though I do spend my workdays surrounded by them here at Capstrat - but I believe in the power of the apology. Will Michael Vick ever play in the NFL again? Too soon to tell. He's still working on rule 3, awaiting his court date. Will Britney ever reclaim her pop diva status? I'm starting to have my doubts; she seems to be having some trouble with rules 1 and 2. And where in the world is Lindsey?!? Looks like she finally decided to commit to the program (sorry, couldn't resist), and I find myself with nothing more to say about the subject. She's got a shot! And Michael...well, Michael just moved to Dubai, and the world keeps turning.

So I find myself here again, glued to CNN, awaiting the full-force rollout of the local, state and federal aid and reassurance that must surely be on its way to California. It IS coming, isn't it?? Surely it is. Lessons were learned. Inefficiencies eliminated. So why, then, do I have this nagging doubt? And, if aid comes pouring in from all directions in an unprecedented fount of good will and systemic lubrication to the seemingly homogenized hills of southern California, how is that going to sit with the poor souls still trying to piece together their lives in the Gulf Coast? I think perhaps I'm still looking for a little more of good ol' rule #1.