So, I just went to the church's fan page on Facebook (props to them for having a fan page and a blog!) and was inspired by what I saw. Surely, there was a service to read along with - complete with a link to a video for the hymn, prayer requests and participation from others via prayer requests, Amen's and comments. They even included the fellowship that usually follows a service (chit chat's in the parking lot, etc.) and people posted photos of their snow adventures and other celebrations.
(You may be wondering - how did this get on the news? Apparently, the pastor invited a friend who is communications director for the Methodist conference and he sent out a release. I think more media outlets should pick up this story!)
This makes me smile. I applaud the church's creativity and outreach. Today, many area residents were able to get in a little worship from their couch - safe and sound - and on Facebook! Perhaps we'll see more of this type of service in the future. I, for one, would be fan!
Get ready. Google is going to change the way that it ranks sites.
Try it
Using the current Google search , Capstrat is 9th. In the new one , we are 5th. While this may not seem like a big deal at first, consider the fact that slipping 11 places can put you on the third page instead of the first. A huge deal for online marketers.
Read more on Google's Webmaster blog.
At SXSW09, I attended a very informative panel entitled “Building Strong Online Communities." Jam packed with useful information for running your own successful communities, I’ve distilled some of the most relevant “don'ts" for us to remember as we create and continue to foster existing communities here at Capstrat.
Try looking at it from this perspective.
There is a company in Greensboro, North Carolina that reportedly helps doctors prepare waivers by which patients agree not to comment online about physician "expertise or treatment." While I can understand physicians' concern over snarky or unfair assessments appearing online, I'm amazed that some doctors apparently think it's okay to ask people to blithely waive their First Amendment rights.
Could anything fly more in the face of a consumer-driven view of health care or the growing online world of candid, two-way conversations between businesses and their customers? Locally, doctors' organizations weren't thrilled when North Carolina's Blue Cross plan began carrying online rankings of physicians managed by Zagat, the folks who serve up restaurant reviews in many cities. One physician grumbled to the Raleigh paper about how awful it was to be rated by Blue Cross staff, apparently unaware of what Zagat's reviews are – first person accounts of patient experience.
Doctors make a valid point that the average person is unqualified to rate a physician's scientific or technical expertise. (I'll save the crying need for expert information on comparative quality for another post.) But there is plenty of first-hand experience that patients can and should share with each other, including wait times, administrative efficiency, ease of scheduling, bedside manner, out-of-pocket costs, etc.
I really want to believe that only a tiny minority of doctors think that stifling debate is the best way to defend their reputations. Personally, I plan to rate each and every one of my doctors. Most of my reviews thus far have been very positive, but where the service provided was really bad (e.g., I couldn't reach a live person by phone – ever), my reviews note this. No bomb throwing, no character assassination, but an honest opinion on how I felt I was treated, for good or ill.
What business expects to survive without listening to that kind of feedback?