The previous post in this series detailed that effective Public Relations (PR) efforts -- like any campaign -- must start with a clear objective, metrics, and baselines. This post focuses on the actual measurements and techniques you can use to measure the effectiveness of your approach.
In doing research on the topic, I came across posts from Don Bartholomew, who writes eloquently about measuring Social Media on his blog, Metrics Man. While his posts focus on Social Media, much of his thinking is relevant to Public Relations. Either way, it's really good and you should definitely check it out for ideas.
What are the measurements you need for PR?
If you've ever tried to measure PR, you've probably come across Advertising Equivalents (AE). Unfortunately, AEs don't really tell you anything useful. I liken it to the age-old marketing metric of "Impressions" sometimes called the "eyeballs metric." The problem with this approach is that it doesn't measure outcomes and measuring whether those "eyeballs" really saw it or not is an iffy proposition.
Another common PR metric is the number of mentions. While it's not a bad idea to try to grow mentions, it again doesn't really point to an end result. You don't do PR to simply get mentioned, you do it to serve a purpose like grow sales, change perception, or avert crisis to name a few goals. Now if you can correlate the number of mentions with tangible financial gains, I'm all for measuring that way.
So after bashing those two metrics, what's my approach?
While the best strategy depends on the specific campaign objective, I'll try to outline the most common objectives and my thoughts on suitable metrics for each:
1) Grow Sales/Leads
What to measure:
2) Change in Perception (i.e. Awareness or Opinion)
What to measure:
3) Avert Crisis/Government Interventions
What to measure:
I've only scratched the surface with potential objectives, but I think you get the idea. If you have other objectives, please feel free to send them to me for further discussion.
Techniques to prove PR had anything to do with those measurements
In looking at some of the metrics above you're probably asking yourself, "OK, those are great, but I am not sure how I can actually relate the PR efforts to these results." I'll grant you some of these are more proxies than direct cause and effect. In fact, causality is likely impossible, instead we are looking for correlation. You could simply look at your baseline results and your post-PR results and make a judgement on effectiveness, but you run the risk of overlooking whether PR was a significant factor in determining the effect. In order to gain some level of confidence in these correlations, may I suggest the following approaches:
1) Statistical Analsysis To connect your efforts to specific results, you will need to conduct statistical analysis using correlation, factor analysis, and regression. Using those terms I've probably just scared off about 90% of the audience reading this post. But if you are still reading, these statistical techniques you ignored during your 2nd year of business school can help you figure out if you've indeed moved the needle in a positive direction, especially if you've adopted the idea of using baselines (as mentioned in my first post).
By peeling back the variables (marketing campaigns, prices, economic factors, etc) and running regression you can figure out which factors had a higher level of significance in driving the behaviors. While it sounds scary, you can actually do this in Excel assuming you have called out the right variables, have decent data, and someone on hand who can help you interpret the results.
2) Isolation is one of the best ways to go about doing the statistical analysis and determining whether your PR effort was significant in driving the metrics. There are a couple of ways to use isolation:
3) Use Tracking Codes in online PR efforts or even offline ones that point to the web as a way to directly understand traffic and conversions based on PR efforts. Example, when you do a press release with a url, add campaign tracking codes to the resolving url to see what these visitors end up doing on your site. Same goes for Twitter or shortened urls. This is the one way where we can see true end to end results based on behavior.
For other insights on how to track PR (and social media), some blogs that I found to be useful:
Journalistics - How to Measure PR
If there are other blogs that folks have found insightful, please post in the comments to share.
So this concludes Part 2...the other scheduled parts will include some further drill-down into using web analytics to measure PR and some hypothetical case studies. But are there other topics you want me to explore? I'd love to hear any suggestions for further topics in this space, so please let me know!
1. Create an objective tied to a business goal - As with any strategy or tactic, you have to define what you hope to accomplish and you have to define it in terms of things senior management thinks are important. You can't just do PR aimlessly and expect good things to happen. This is true with any marketing campaign, web page, collateral, etc., and PR is no exception. For example, suppose you have a growing problem with negative sentiment towards your brand/company/persona. Your objective is to combat that negativity through proactive PR. It may seem like a trivial exercise, but we often find ourselves in execution mode before we've even accurately defined the problem we are trying to address. Take the time and define the objective.
2. Agree in advance on how you will measure the objective - Without this, you are going to have problems understanding if you have been successful and securing future funding to do this kind of work. You might propose web analytics to determine how often people are searching for your brand, or you might turn to surveys if you want to assess your brand's reputation. Think through what you need to measure and choose the right tool for the challenge at hand.
3. Establish a baseline - You need to have an idea of where you currently stand in order to determine if your efforts have had the desired impact. Don't solely rely on intuition or an apparent consensus among the powers that be. Start with a real number on your organization's current performance, whether it comes from surveys, sales or lead generation. Keep in mind that the bottom line for the C-suite is, well, the bottom line. Financial measures can be difficult to tie to PR efforts directly, but people will really sit up and take notice if you can find a way to do that.
4. Be sure your PR campaign strategy and resources align with your objective - This may sound obvious, but you'd be surprised how often organizations get caught up in silos, fall back on "how we've always done it," or just get lost in tactics at the expense of carrying out a comprehensive strategy. Be sure your strategy aligns with what you already know: what customers have told you they think is important, how geographic differences come into play, and what you've learned from demographics and marketing research that your company has probably spent a lot of money to accumulate. You may have to invest in surveys for questions that are new to the organization, but don't neglect the low-hanging fruit: existing customer data, web analytics, and data on competitors from tools like compete.com or Hitwise. Using the data to craft the PR strategy will help ensure that your message reaches the right audience.
Part 2 will explore the next steps: How to Measure and What to Measure...stay tuned later in the week.