Get ready. Google is going to change the way that it ranks sites.
Try it
Using the current Google search , Capstrat is 9th. In the new one , we are 5th. While this may not seem like a big deal at first, consider the fact that slipping 11 places can put you on the third page instead of the first. A huge deal for online marketers.
Read more on Google's Webmaster blog.
We've all become accustomed to using the Web as the resource we turn to first for just about anything – including information about medicines. As an advertising medium, the Web is outpacing television. So drug marketers are racing for the highest position in Google search results. But the landscape is changing fast.
A recent article published in DTC Perspectives breaks down the dilemma. The text ads attached to search results act as qualifying statements that help search engines sort through information. But regulators fear that people will read those descriptions as ads and interpret the text as real information. So the FDA is cracking down on search engine optimization for pharmaceuticals. Now, the string of words that appear under Web site listings in the rankings must include full disclosure of risk information.
This new rule will make it harder for many pharmaceutical companies to reach the top of the search engine ranks. If they have to include the risks and adverse events in the text ads, their key consumer messages will get buried. Many drugs, especially those in the same therapeutic categories treating the same ailments, share the same commonly reported adverse events. The competition to buy and use those descriptors will be large, and consumers will have a harder time finding what they're looking for.
There are ways around this. Pharmaceutical companies can buy text ads that don't include the drug name, then replace the URLs with copy that relates to a specific medical problem. This tactic allows them to get more creative with their messaging, and it might help lower the bidding on certain key words. But it also means fewer people will find their Web sites. Because of this confusion, the FDA is likely to loosen its reins once it learns more about the Web and how people use it. Give it a few more years and the FDA may back off completely.
Until then, pharmaceutical companies have an opportunity to be more clever and have fun with their online ads. And this period of chaos, however temporary, will give some players a chance to grab newfound prominence.
Interesting Note:
A Google search for “acid park” reveals that Google only indexed 3 of the above links with a reference to those key words:
Another interesting note:
This page:
http://blog.capstrat.com/tags/raleigh/
Was indexed by Google, but a search for acid park does not return this page. Why?
Numbers
Our 1300+ page Web site has only a fraction of that number of actual posts. Posts often appear at 5 or 6 different URLs.
A little looking around revealed a couple of opinions:
Search Engine Guide says “Such duplication also leaves you open to splitting link value between multiple URLs. If someone links to a (page), they may link to any of the multiple versions, instead of a single primary version/URL. This can cause the search engines to give weight to the "wrong" URLs.”
SEO Book says “Interesting tactic by Google. If too many pages on the same site trip a duplicate content filter Google does not just filter through to find the best result, sometimes they filter out ALL the pages from that site.”
Thoughts from the experts?